Award Prize
The winner of each award category will receive $1000 and an engraved award plaquette.
Judging Panel
Our judging panel comprises of independent mental health experts, professionals from the sector, past award recipients, and individuals specialising in specific categories. Wayahead staff are not involved in the judging process for the awards.
How to Nominate
Do you know someone making remarkable contributions to mental health? Nominate yourself, a program you’re involved with, or an individual or initiative you admire for their outstanding work.
We are here to help and answer any questions you may have about the Awards or the nomination process. Please contact:
email: abby.henze@wayahead.org.au or phone: +61 2 9339 6021
For full category descriptions, eligibility criteria, and nomination links, please refer to the details provided below.
Nomination Guidelines
Please review the following guidelines before submitting a nomination:
Nominations should relate to projects, programs, or initiatives that are accessible to and hold significance for the people of NSW.
We kindly ask that nominations are not submitted for consideration in multiple categories.
Each organisation or individual may submit only one nomination; quality of nominations will be prioritised over quantity.
Staff and volunteers affiliated with Wayahead, as well as sponsors of the Awards (such as ACON), are ineligible for nomination.
Previous award recipients are not eligible for self-nomination for a period of three years following their award.
How the Awards are Judged
Each nomination will be judged by a panel of judges with relevant expertise.
Judging is based on the following criteria:
Innovation and Approach –
Is the nomination doing something new? Combining existing things in new ways? Or are they bringing new perspectives to existing systems? Is the approach taken by the nomination appropriate? Does it reach the people it aims to? Do the aims of the project match the approach taken?
Involvement –
How are consumers, carers, and/or community involved in the design, implementation, and evaluation of the nomination? Note: as a rule, we favour those which show clear evidence of consumer, carer, and/or community involvement in all stages. For the “Leadership through Lived Experience Award” this criterion is adjusted to focus on the leadership aspects, including demonstration of incorporating principles of consumer leadership, co-design, and building these skills in others.
Response –
How has the project been received and what impact has it had? Has the response been well received by the target audience/group? Has there been strong interest in the project or positive evaluation? Not all projects will have access to detailed evaluation techniques. Nominations will not be penalised for not having access to intricate evaluation techniques. Do the outcomes/response match the aims and/or are appropriate to the project.